Home | Site Map | Contact Us
 
Skip navigation links
The Association
Commission on Accrediting
Resources
Leadership Education
Member Schools
Meetings & Events
 
Saint Paul School of Theology St Charles Borromeo Seminary St John's University School of Theology - Seminary Denver Seminary Bethany Theological Seminary Evangelical Theological Seminary
The Accreditation Process: Another View 

This document is a talking-points paper for an oral presentation introducing the ATS Commission Self-Study process.

What is "accreditation"?

Three "moments" in the historical development of ATS accreditation:

  • Resource audit/institutional capacity
  • Significant membership expansion, with new members having differing "purposes," shifts the emphasis of accreditation to resources and degree programs
  • Shift to "institutional effectiveness"

Accreditation

  • is aspirational, about institutional improvement, and a catalyst for a good school to become better
  • is worth investment of the valuable, intellectual capital of the faculty to gather a "snapshot" of what is working well in addition to what is in need of attention
  • is not licensing or getting a ticket punched
  • has institutional effectiveness as its overarching objective

Three critical questions for the school are

  • Does the school have the capacity to assess effectiveness?
  • How well does it use its capacity?
  • How does the school use the results of its assessment activities for ongoing improvement?

Accreditation is both a process and a product

De-mystifying the "outcomes effectiveness" expectation in higher education:

  • Evaluation—basic theme
  • Benchmarks for process
  • Process is straightforward
  • People makes decisions—not data!

Two components of accreditation

  • The self-study
  • The visit

Summary

Accreditation is both a process and a product.

Accreditation requires a good self-study include the following characteristics:

  • Sufficiently descriptive, but primarily focused on analysis
  • Sufficient data are provided to substantiate and provide for the reader evidence bearing on the issues under discussion
  • Clear decisions or conclusions result from the analysis, (e.g., identifies strengths to be sustained areas of needed growth)
  • Utilizes available and useful ATS data, (e.g., Strategic Information Report, Institutional Peer Profile Report)
  • Has a good concluding chapter that gathers the findings and recommendations provides the agenda for strategic and long-term planning
  • A one- to two-page update of actions taken since the self-study was submitted.