Home | Site Map | Contact Us
 
Skip navigation links
The Association
Commission on Accrediting
Resources
Leadership Education
Member Schools
Meetings & Events
In the News
 
Claremont School of Theology Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary Saint Vincent Seminary St Charles Borromeo Seminary Lancaster Theological Seminary Seattle University School of Theology and Ministry
The Accreditation Process: Another View 

This document is a talking-points paper for an oral presentation introducing the ATS Commission Self-Study process.

What is "accreditation"?

Three "moments" in the historical development of ATS accreditation:

  • Resource audit/institutional capacity
  • Significant membership expansion, with new members having differing "purposes," shifts the emphasis of accreditation to resources and degree programs
  • Shift to "institutional effectiveness"

Accreditation

  • is aspirational, about institutional improvement, and a catalyst for a good school to become better
  • is worth investment of the valuable, intellectual capital of the faculty to gather a "snapshot" of what is working well in addition to what is in need of attention
  • is not licensing or getting a ticket punched
  • has institutional effectiveness as its overarching objective

Three critical questions for the school are

  • Does the school have the capacity to assess effectiveness?
  • How well does it use its capacity?
  • How does the school use the results of its assessment activities for ongoing improvement?

Accreditation is both a process and a product

De-mystifying the "outcomes effectiveness" expectation in higher education:

  • Evaluation—basic theme
  • Benchmarks for process
  • Process is straightforward
  • People makes decisions—not data!

Two components of accreditation

  • The self-study
  • The visit

Summary

Accreditation is both a process and a product.

Accreditation requires a good self-study include the following characteristics:

  • Sufficiently descriptive, but primarily focused on analysis
  • Sufficient data are provided to substantiate and provide for the reader evidence bearing on the issues under discussion
  • Clear decisions or conclusions result from the analysis, (e.g., identifies strengths to be sustained areas of needed growth)
  • Utilizes available and useful ATS data, (e.g., Strategic Information Report, Institutional Peer Profile Report)
  • Has a good concluding chapter that gathers the findings and recommendations provides the agenda for strategic and long-term planning
  • A one- to two-page update of actions taken since the self-study was submitted.