Evaluation visits are the second of three steps in the accreditation process, coming after the self-study but before any final actions by the Board of Commissioners (see Part Three of the
new Self-Study Handbook). Evaluators are peers who serve without remuneration,
typically spending three to four days on campus, as well as devoting many hours before and after the visit to reviewing documents and writing an evaluation committee report. Evaluation
committees consist of three to five persons, including an administrator, an academic/educator, and a ministry practitioner (though others may be added as needed, for example, for distance
education). An ATS staff person usually accompanies the evaluation committee, acting as a resource for the school and the committee.
Serving on an evaluation committee is often described by participants as "one of the best forms of professional development," not only because of what is learned about how the Standards promote quality education in different contexts but also because of rich and rewarding interactions with peers. For more information about evaluation visits, see sections III.B.1-10 of the Policies and Procedures and Part Three of the new Self-Study Handbook. Other helpful documents and training materials are made available to evaluation committee members through Canvas, the online learning management system the ATS Commission uses for evaluation visitors. The ATS Commission staff provides other training sessions for members of evaluation committees, including various workshops and one-on-one mentoring before, during, and after visits.
*NOTE: The ATS Commission has also developed a new website called Understanding the Standards. It provides many helpful resources for those wanting to become familiar with the new Standards, as well as with the new Policies and Procedures, with tips also for those engaged in self-studies and in evaluation visits.
As part of its responsibilities to the membership and to the public, the Commission on Accrediting publishes prior to each semester a list of schools receiving comprehensive evaluation visits during that semester. The Commission invites third-party comments regarding schools scheduled to receive such visits, which may be sent by email to firstname.lastname@example.org (see Policies and Procedures III.B.2). In addition to this listing, the school should announce the visit to its constituencies (e.g., via its website, newsletter, or social media) at least 45 days prior to its visit, using language such as the following:
“[Name of school] is hosting a comprehensive evaluation visit for reaffirmation of [or, for initial] accreditation by the ATS Commission on Accrediting on [list dates of visit]. The purpose of this visit is to verify that the school meets all applicable Commission Standards of Accreditation. Comments regarding how well the school meets those standards and/or generally demonstrates educational quality may be sent to email@example.com at least two weeks before the visit. Comments may also or instead be sent in writing to [list official at school, along with contact information]. All comments will be shared with the onsite evaluation committee.”
Candler School of Theology of Emory University
Claremont School of Theology
Concordia Seminary (MO)
Hartford International University for Religion and Peace
Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology
Hood Theological Seminary
Knox Theological Seminary
Palmer Theological Seminary of Eastern University
Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Saint Paul Seminary School of Divinity
St. Peter's Seminary
St. Tikhon's Orthodox Theological Seminary
University of Notre Dame Department of Theology
Western Theological Seminary